The death in December of the celebrated Toronto lawyer, Eddie Greenspan, produced many fond and admiring recollections. Here is another one.

But first, a little background information. I am on the Board of the Couchiching Conference, a worthy group that encourages discussions of topics of public interest, especially at the annual August Conference beside, yes, Lake Couchiching. In fact, with Heather Keachie I co-chaired last year’s conference on Sport.

Running a public-interest group like this costs money, so we do lots of fund-raising. One of our most effective methods is the Couchiching Gala in Spring, where members of the public can get a fine meal, and choose to sit at a table hosted by one specific celebrity guest. At Archaeo Restaurant in April 2014 among many interesting possible table companions was Eddie Greenspan, widely recognised as Canada’s leading defence lawyer. Jane and I signed up for an evening of Eddie’s table talk, along with five fortunate others.

I had an extra role. As a Couch Board member, I was asked to “host” the table, in effect to direct the discussion, to make sure that Eddie held the floor, and to keep the table centred on one conversation. I was not a bad choice for the role. Leaving aside the question of natural assertiveness (some might use words like “rude”), I was a friend of Eddie’s. We had met way back in the 1970s, when I edited By Persons Unknown: The Strange Death of Christine Demeter, written by George Jonas and Barbara Amiel. The 1977 account of what was then the longest murder trial in Canadian history was a huge commercial success, won prizes for its authors, and was useful to my career as a trouble-making non-fiction editor.

Much more important, the Demeter trial brought the junior defence Counsel, Eddie Greenspan, into the limelight, until he eclipsed the famous defence lead, Joe Pomerant. It was clear to everyone around the headline-making trial that a legal star had just been born.

I met Eddie behind the scenes in those days, and was impressed by this comfortably-built man with a thick head of hair and a very direct look. I especially liked his natural style, which included the straightforward use of simple language. This is a gift not universally shared, as we were reminded when Eddie later took on the case of Conrad Black. Sadly, the verbose Conrad proved to be a poor loser when he went to jail, and his attack on the performance of his chosen counsel, Eddie Greenspan, prompted Eddie to write a wry defence in the newspaper, where he noted that it is not unknown for people in jail to blame their lawyers.

Because of our link, I once took the chance to see Eddie in action in court. It was not an especially important case, except to Gordon Allan, Eddie’s client, who had been accused of murder. I went along for Eddie’s summing up. He said, in effect : “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we’ve been here for many days, and we’ve heard many confusing suggestions about what happened on the day of this sad event. Let me try to explain to you what really happened….” And he went on, very simply, with no courtroom theatrics, no fancy oratory, just kindly explaining it all.

When he had finished, and we broke for lunch, it was obvious that Eddie’s client was going to be found not guilty. And he was.

I began our evening conversation by recalling that trial, and Eddie described the details well. Then we were off, ranging across his cases over the years, from Demeter to Black, and dealing with wider issues such as the wisdom of juries against the errors of judges, and the whole issue of his successful fight against capital punishment. It was all frank and witty, and such a constant source of information that I had to interrupt to allow him to snatch a bite to eat. At the end of the evening, Eddie slipped off into the night, after I had ushered him to the door, trying to express the deep gratitude of all of us at the table.

I saw him again in November, when once again Eddie was slipping away from another legal-book event. We hailed each other, I clapped his arm, but we did not have the chance to chat. The Couch Gala remains a vivid memory, however, of the unforgettable Eddie Greenspan.



  1. Leslie Nadon says:

    Doug Gibson, you did it again!!! Sweet synchronicity. I hardly know where to start. On my fridge I have a note. Pick up my Doug Gibson’s book from Gael. I just did that recently. Now, we can add “BY PERSONS UNKNOWN”. I taught a seminar called “MURDER SHE WROTE” for my astrology students and although I have worked and solved three murder cases with police [that I don’t talk about] and although not involved in the Demeter case, I used it as one of my examples from the point of view of details related to astrology. I hope to include that in my third book about my radio show, “Ye Olde English Astrologer”. Yesterday, Jan 21, 2015 was unbelievable in terms of synchronicity. One of the murder cases I solved was about a teacher born Jan 21. She lived in the Toronto area. Have to get details organized. Am putting files together on that now, as I finish the second rough draft of “TEDDY BEARS & I.V. THERAPY”, Memoirs of a Mother, about my three CF’ers , who spent every summer up at Camp Couchiching when they were there as teens from age 12 to age 18]. I had an article published last summer [6000 copies] in KIN MAGAZINE about Denise, Dale and Mike. The article I put together was in the form of a query letter, hoping that KIN CANADA might help me get published. I have 6000 KINSMEN and KINETTES, and 4000 CF MAMAS, plus over 90,000 readers of my column in WINDSOR LIFE MAGAZINE plus CF families all over the world and their relatives waiting for me to get published. My problem is getting an agent and a publisher. Is there any possible way that you can help me do this? I know you are busy with your own book and other matters, but I really need to get this done. I will try to send a copy of the article in KIN MAGAZINE. Not sure if you will receive it. Somehow you keep showing up in my life – like ghost ships passing in the night. There must be a good reason for that. I won’t give up. My three CF Angels won’t let me. Thank you. Leslie Nadon
    I always enjoy reading your posts. I am not sure where this will show up. I will leave that up to you.

    • Doug Gibson says:

      It was kind to you to write about my Eddie Greenspan piece. and how many co-incidences you found!
      I wish I were still in the Publishing game to help you with you new book, but that’s not the case. I’d advise you to keep working away at the list of Literary Agents, until you find one that sees the market possibilities.
      Good luck!

  2. aimee love says:

    hey leslie
    ever think as a christian if you tried to help people for free instead of the almighty dollar maybe your family would still be alive today?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s